Why didn't the democrats sit down at a table before rushing into this damaging campaign ? Why didn't they sit down and decide on a couple of candidates, two or three at most. I can understand opinions being different, or political approaches being slightly different in a party... but 9 candidates ???

It is serving two purposes right now...
1 / The republicans' campaing hasn't formally started yet, although Bush never really got out of his 2000 campaign and has spent more time campaigning and fundraising since he is in office than focusing on domestic and international policies... but yet democrats candidates and lack of consensus have already fueled the fire which will burn them
2/ Bush campaing team will just need to look back at this childish dems campaign and reuse their stupid and pointless (but convincing for the mass) arguments used during the various debates.


Come on, somebody needs to clean up this early campaign, and try to elevate the debate and force the real issues, the topics or policies which will make our country a better one. A better one for everybody at home, as well as a better leader or influencer internationally.

SA